If your basis is zero, this means the amount you eventually sell the property for is all taxable gain.Before you can figure out the tax effects of the liquidation, you'll need to know your adjusted tax basis in the partnership.
Tax on a liquidating distribution
The transaction is treated somewhat differently if a shareholder owns more than one block of stock, and receives a series of distributions in complete liquidation. To be sure, since the state law in the IRS example brought about an automatic transfer (to its shareholders) of a dissolved corporation’s assets, it followed that the company’s dissolution did not give rise to a complete liquidation.
In that case, each distribution is allocated ratably among the several blocks. So, the ruling concludes that the dissolution and reincorporation did not result, respectively, in a distribution or transfer of the corporation’s properties.
To be taxed as a liquidating distribution, however, a partner's interest in the partnership must terminate.
Only partners who receive a liquidating distribution of cash may have an immediate taxable gain or loss to report.
If it is considered terminated, the company would have been viewed as having completely liquidated, and both it and its shareholders would have experienced the tax consequences attendant to the situation. In other words, in most cases, the liquidation of a corporation commonly engenders two levels of taxation: tax will be imposed at both the corporate and distributee shareholder levels.* The De Facto Company Closure A complete liquidation is not always accompanied by a formal or legal company shutdown. Thus, unless dissolution brings about an automatic transfer of the corporation’s assets to its shareholders, the corporation, even though dissolved, continues its existence.
However, in some cases, complete liquidation need not be accompanied by a formal or legal dissolution of the corporation. Complete liquidation When a corporation is completely liquidated, it transfers all of its assets to its shareholders—whether the assets are cash or property—and the shareholders assume the corporation’s remaining liabilities. According to Section 1.332-2(c) of the tax code, “…legal dissolution is not required…” What’s more, a related revenue rule (Rev. Accordingly, the continuation of existence, after dissolution, may well depend on whether the governing state law provides that a dissolved corporation can still own assets.That’s done in the same proportion that the number of shares within a block bears to the total number of shares owned by the shareholder. In addition, the dissolution and reincorporation will not affect its shareholders’ bases and holding period in its stock.Further, shareholders are permitted to recover their entire basis in a block before reporting gain. More to the point, notwithstanding the dissolution and reincorporation, no new corporation is deemed to come into existence so the corporate taxpayer is not required to apply for a new Employer Identification Number.The tax treatment of the shareholders is governed by the tax code’s Section 331(a), which provides that amounts distributed in complete liquidation, “shall be treated as in full payment in exchange for the stock.” Generally, stockholders record a gain (usually capital in nature), if the net distributions of the surrendered stock is greater than the shareholder’s adjusted basis in the stock. If state law allows a dissolved company to own assets, the dissolution, unless accompanied by an actual conveyance of the entity’s assets to its shareholders, will not give rise to a liquidation.Conversely, the stockholders record a loss (also, almost always a capital loss), if the net distribution is less than their adjusted basis in the stock surrendered in the transaction. Indeed, in that situation, the tax consequences spelled out in ( Section 331(a) and Section 336(a) will not be visited on the shareholders and the corporation, respectively.** Federal Law Governs The ruling concludes that the “core test of corporate existence,” for purposes of federal income taxation, is always, a matter of federal law.For example, increasing adjustments are made for additional contributions you make and to reflect your share of partnership income, whereas decreasing adjustments are required for partnership losses and profit withdrawals.